Credibility doesn't travel by itself
The question isn't whether your work is excellent. The question is: when someone who matters is in a room without you and your name comes up, what do they say?
The question isn't whether your work is excellent. The question is: when someone who matters is in a room without you and your name comes up, what do they say?
Tentative language, including hedges, qualifiers, excessive apologies, and diminutives like "just" and "quickly," consistently reduces observer assessments of capability and authority, independent of the quality of the idea being expressed.
The longer you have led, the more certain you tend to be that you know your organisation. New research across 300,000 people in 20 countries suggests that certainty is one of the least reliable things about seniority.
Good work doesn't speak for itself. Credibility is assigned based on what decision-makers know you've done, not what you've done. This week: why visibility is a structural problem, not a character compromise, and what to do about it.
The most prepared person in the room is often the least credible one. It isn't that they don't know their material. They usually know it better than anyone else in there. They don't realise that over-preparation reads as anxiety, not capability.
Authenticity and capability - combined, visible, and legible to the people who matter - outperforms performance every time. Not performance as in results. Performance as in the managed version of yourself you put on for rooms that make you feel like you have to earn your place in them.